Animal Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

wight Rights - Essay ExampleTorturing a cat or setting it on the fire by the way of childish prank is one of the key examples of wrongdoing in the literature of philosophy. It is accredited that solely breathing animals have morale proper(a)s like forgiving beings. They breathe and live like us. Most importantly God created the animals. Therefore, it can be verbalise that non- adult male animals also have the basic rights similar to the human beings. It is true that all the non-human animals play effective role in the society. Therefore, it is the responsibility of human beings to give proper appraise to these non-human animals. The non-human animals also can life their joy, pain and sorrow similar to the human beings. Therefore, it can be stated that it is the responsibility of the human beings to be kind to the non-human animals. Question 2 It will be unsocial and wrong if the human beings treat the non-human animals as the ends in themselves. The non-human animals have t he wakeless rights to live like the human beings. totally the non-human animals have effective value, percentage and responsibility in the ecology (Regan 13). It is necessary to have all kinds of animals in the society as it helps to maintain the ecological balance. The human beings achieve huge benefits and advantages from these non-human animals. The non-human animals have important contri moreoverion in agricultural and industrial sectors. Therefore, animals have the right to die or get injured if they distress the human beings. Similarly, it is the right of the innocent non-human animals to live without fear in the society. Human beings should not hurt or obliterate the non-human animals considering the law of humanity. This law of humanity does not allow the human beings to torture or kill a non human animal. The human beings atomic number 18 mentally strong than these non-human animals. Human beings ar known as social animals. They be more intelligent than the non huma n animals. It is true that, the non-human animals cannot think like the human beings, but they can feel and respond to external factors in similar way. Therefore, it can be stated that, human beings should not treat the non human animals as ends in themselves as it will violate the law of nature. Cows, dogs, cats and birds are the domestic animals. They give unconditional love to human beings. Similarly it is the responsibility of human beings to take consider of their lives and needs. They cannot communicate with the human beings through their voice. But it is true that they can feel things in similar way. These non-human animals are called obedient animals. They are loyal to the owners. Therefore, the attitude of human beings towards these non human animals should be changed. In terms of fundamental rights of non-human animals and moral ethics, it can be stated that killing or torturing of animals should be stopped as it can hamper the ecological balance. Question 3 According to Kants argument, the non-human animals have souls as they are able to move. It is an ontological distinction between the non-human animals and depicted objects. The non-human animals are not just matters or mere machines. The animals do have souls as everything in the nature is either animate or inanimate. Moreover, the non-human animal can feel the inner aspects, such as pain, joy and sorrow. Therefore, it can be stated that the non-human animals are an animated matter lack of inner spontaneity principle. According to the ethical view of Kant, the human beings have the ethical right to injure or kill the non human animals. Moreover, he argued that the non human animals should be killed without pain and quickly. This action should not be for the sake of entertainment and sport. According to Kant, the human beings should not perform the painful experiments on these non human a